Science and is built on the foundation of integrity and trust, and questionable research practices or research misconduct is counter-productive to the production and use of scientific knowledge. Not only does it dilute the research findings and lead to misinterpretations, it also leads to an overall loss of trust in the work done by the scientific community. Hence any kind of research misconduct or malpractice is considered a grave issue that needs to be strictly avoided. This makes it critical for scientists and researchers to gain an understanding of the best practices and ethical research to avoid unknowingly venturing into such grey areas. This article delves into what is scientific misconduct, different types of research misconduct, and 5 reasons for committing research misconduct.
What is research misconduct?
Research misconduct or scientific misconduct refers to actions and behaviors by researchers that fail to honor the integrity of research. The Office of Research Integrity defines research misconduct as the falsification, fabrication or plagiarism in conducting, planning, reporting or reviewing research[1]. Simply put, research misconduct is any intentional deviation from ethical research practices. A scientific misconduct example is deliberately creating names and details of survey participants for the purpose of generating data, which is an unethical research practice. Other common scientific misconduct examples include modifying or omitting data to influence study findings or withholding critical information from human participants in clinical trials or experiments.
Types of research misconduct
There are different types of research misconduct or scientific misconduct and unethical practices in research. The most serious ethical infractions are fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism in research. Some of the most common types of research misconduct have been detailed below.
- Fabrication: This refers to the practice of making up data without having done the required research. Research misconduct covers not only the act of fabrication, but also the sharing, discussing, or publishing of this fabricated data or results.
- Falsification: This type of scientific misconduct involves the wilful manipulation of data, materials, processes, or equipment to arrive at a predefined conclusion. One such example would be selectively omitting or changing data, which results in the erroneous representation of research results.
- Plagiarism: This is one of the most common types of scientific misconduct, and involves using another person’s ideas, content, writing, processes, or results without giving due credit. This also includes self-plagiarism, which occurs when you replicate your own writings or ideas from previously published research without providing proper credit.
- Authorship: This type of scientific misconduct in research includes attempts to assign false authorships without adequate contribution to research, mentioning authors without their consent, or failing to include authors who are original contributors. Naming authors in the wrong order or incorrectly is also considered unethical.
- Conflicts of interest: This can be classified under general scientific misconduct and involves lapses by researchers in declaring any conflict of interests in their research work. These conflicts of interest may be financial, personal, and professional and need to be reported appropriately to avoid any ethical issues.
- Approvals: One of the most important aspect of research that involves human or animal subjects is adhering to all the ethical approvals and legal guidelines. Non-compliance with this ethical mandate is considered a serious type of research misconduct.
5 Reasons for committing research misconduct
Over time there have been varied reasons for researchers to succumb to scientific misconduct. Let us look at 5 reasons for committing research misconduct.
- Career pressures: An important factor often associated with research misconduct is the undue pressure researchers face. They need to conduct original research in a fast-paced environment, publish frequently in peer reviewed journals, and procure funding for research projects to advance their research career. This along with the need to juggle multiple responsibilities against tight deadlines create undue stress to succeed at any cost, leading to a lack of care or even deliberate research misconduct.
- Researcher’s personal psychology: Some researchers may be overly driven by a desire to quickly attain a strong professional reputation or even financial gains, which could push them to research misconduct.
- Lack of appropriate training and skills: The lack of training on the best practices and ethical guidelines to be followed as researchers is another reason for research misconduct. Poor awareness and understanding on these issues often lead to unethical conduct in research.
- Insufficient supervision or mentoring: Related to the point above, this relates to situations where researchers, especially early career researchers, fail to receive sufficient and appropriate support from immediate supervisors or from their affiliated institution. A lack of oversight and guidance may knowingly or unknowingly lead to research misconduct.
- Inadequate knowledge: Scientific misconduct can occur if the researcher does not have sufficient knowledge of the topic/subject or on research best practices. Carelessness when conducting research and reporting it are also considered research misconduct.
Researchers and institutions should adopt various measures to prevent the occurrence of scientific misconduct. The most significant aspect is the provision of adequate training that builds researcher knowledge as to what constitutes research misconduct and how best to avoid this. It is vital for institutions to have guidelines and procedures related to good research practices and ethical conduct and ensure it is disseminated effectively among their research community.
It is also important for supervisors to mentor budding researchers on the correct procedures and practices, including what constitutes ethical misconduct in research. Without sufficient awareness, it will be difficult to effectively address this important issue. Finally, researchers must take it upon themselves to check the global standards and guidelines for ethical research to ensure they are not engaging in any scientific misconduct.
FAQs
Q: What are the consequences of research misconduct?
Research misconduct, which includes fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism, can lead to severe repercussions. These may involve damage to a researcher’s reputation, loss of funding, retraction of published papers, and academic sanctions. Additionally, it undermines scientific integrity, erodes public trust, and hampers the advancement of knowledge. Institutions may conduct investigations, resulting in job loss and legal actions. Overall, research misconduct has far-reaching negative impacts on individuals, institutions, and the scientific community as a whole.
Q: What are the major causes of research misconduct?
Research misconduct arises from various factors such as pressure to publish, competition for grants, and career advancement. Lack of supervision, inadequate training in ethical research practices, and poor research culture can contribute. High publication demands may drive researchers to cut corners, leading to fabrication of data, falsification of results, and even plagiarism. Ethical lapses might also stem from personal ambition, greed, or the desire to bolster one’s professional standing, ultimately undermining the credibility of scientific work.
Q: What is meant by falsification in research?
Falsification refers to the deliberate manipulation or alteration of research data, methods, or results to present inaccurate or misleading information. This unethical practice involves misrepresenting findings by selectively omitting data, changing results, or altering graphs and images. Falsification distorts the truth, compromises research integrity, and can have profound implications for scientific progress and public trust in research outcomes.
Q: What are some examples of scientific misconduct?
Scientific misconduct encompasses various behaviors such as plagiarism, where one presents others’ work as their own. Fabrication involves inventing data or results that do not exist. Falsification includes altering or manipulating data to fit a desired outcome. Misleading authorship and inadequate citation of sources are also forms of misconduct. Additionally, improper handling of human or animal subjects, failure to disclose conflicts of interest, and misrepresentation of credentials can occur. These actions breach ethical standards, erode scientific credibility, and can lead to severe consequences for individuals and the research community.
References
- Definition of Research Misconduct. The Office of Research Integrity. Available online at https://ori.hhs.gov/definition-research-misconduct
R Discovery is a literature search and research reading platform that accelerates your research discovery journey by keeping you updated on the latest, most relevant scholarly content. With 250M+ research articles sourced from trusted aggregators like CrossRef, Unpaywall, PubMed, PubMed Central, Open Alex and top publishing houses like Springer Nature, JAMA, IOP, Taylor & Francis, NEJM, BMJ, Karger, SAGE, Emerald Publishing and more, R Discovery puts a world of research at your fingertips.
Try R Discovery Prime FREE for 1 week or upgrade at just US$72 a year to access premium features that let you listen to research on the go, read in your language, collaborate with peers, auto sync with reference managers, and much more. Choose a simpler, smarter way to find and read research – Download the app and start your free 7-day trial today!
