It’s not uncommon for budding academics to make errors in research, such as leaving out key aspects when setting up the research project. That is why experts suggest having a clear goal and using the right processes and methods as you plan and refine your research design. It is important that you pay attention to details, think thorough methodologies to be used, and come up with several iterations of the research design you plan to adopt and follow. This means sticking to rules and guidelines, choosing research methods that fit your specific subject and project, deciding on the best ways to collect and report data, and even consider peer reviews. Doing this will help negate possible errors in research and ensure that you are able to undertake more accurate and effective research work.
In this article, we’ll take a look at some of the most common errors in research, with examples, that every academic should know about and carefully check to avoid in their work.
Sampling errors
This type of error occurs when only a certain section of the population is selected to represent the whole population. Since the chosen sample is not representative of the entire population the results can often be skewed and inaccurate. Sampling errors are influenced by factors such as sample design, sample size, variability in the population and so on. A simple example here would be a study to predict the outcome of a national election. Instead of collecting data from a random, representative sample of voters, you only survey people attending a political rally for a specific candidate. This sampling error could skew the results and be misleading. Researchers need to be aware of these errors and carefully apply sampling principles to minimize potential errors in research results. Increasing the sample size or having larger more inclusive sample groups, in general, can help reduce and avoid such errors in research.
Population specification errors
This type of error occurs when the researcher is confused about or unable to understand how to identify and choose sample groups for a survey or study. Take for example a healthcare research study that aims to understand the prevalence of a certain medical condition among all adults aged 50 and above. If the researchers fail to clearly define the age range or use inconsistent criteria across different data sources, it could lead to errors and inconsistencies in their findings. To avoid such issues, researchers will need to establish the objective of the research survey right at the very beginning. They must be able to clearly specify the problem statement and accordingly define the most appropriate and relevant target population for the research.
Selection errors
This type of error stems from the various aspects involving the population under study. Examples of such errors in research include both people who volunteer to participate in a study and those who decide to not to be a part of it; research conclusions in such cases will run the risk of being biased and inaccurate. For example, some respondents may voluntarily participate, while others refuse to respond to a survey on public opinion regarding climate change. If those who participate have a stronger interest in the environment than those who decline, the survey’s conclusions may be biased because it fails to represent the diversity of views in the population accurately. To minimize selection error, it is important to detail or characterize the sample group as clearly as possible and set clear guidelines for selecting participants.
Non-responsive errors
This type of error in research may occur when individuals in a sample are unwilling or unable to participate in the study and they differ from those who participate. Non-responsive errors impact the overall study as all the units of the sample are not reflected in the data when some participants may not respond to all or some of the set of survey questions. Consider an employee satisfaction survey, where some employees do not respond to all the questions resulting in incomplete and potentially biased results. This lack of response may occur due to various reasons, including the sensitive nature of questions, a lack of understanding, language problems, paucity of time and so on. Such errors in research can be avoided by training interviewers to be sensitive and design appropriate questionnaires, undertaking follow-up surveys, keeping the questions simple, sending reminders, and ensuring full confidentiality.
Measurement errors
This type of error in research arises when there is a difference between the observed and the true values. It can be a chance difference or consistent differences between the values being studied. For example, in a study measuring the length of certain fish species, researchers use different tools and measuring techniques across different data collection sites. As a result, the recorded measurements are inconsistent and do not accurately represent the true values, leading to measurement errors. Researchers need to identify the cause of such errors and rectify it to avoid any bias and prevent it affecting the final conclusions of the study.
Questionnaire issues
This kind of error in research arises when the wordings of the questions are confusing and paradoxical, or when they are too long and repetitive. Early career researchers must make sure that survey questions are clear and easy to understand while addressing the objectives of the study. Also, try and avoid the usage of leading questions that can influence the responses of the participants. For example, when gathering information about consumer preferences for a new product, avoid leading questions such as “How much do you love our amazing new product?” Such questions may influence participants to respond more favorably than they genuinely feel, leading to biased and inaccurate data. Problems may also arise due to the format and layout of the questionnaire, so care must be taken to ensure that they are presented simply and accurately. Experts suggest pre-testing the questionnaire with a small sample batch which can help ensure it is understood clearly.
Processing errors
This type of error in research typically creeps in during the various stages of data processing. For example, a data entry personnel may make a typographical error when inputting data for a large-scale survey on public health from paper into a computer database. If the data is not carefully checked when entered, it can lead to errors such as missing, incorrect, or repetition of data. It is crucial for researchers to be vigilant to avoid such errors in research, because even minor slips can affect the accuracy of the study results and conclusions, negating all the work put into the research.
Editage All Access is a subscription-based platform that unifies the best AI tools and services designed to speed up, simplify, and streamline every step of a researcher’s journey. The Editage All Access Pack is a one-of-a-kind subscription that unlocks full access to an AI writing assistant, literature recommender, journal finder, scientific illustration tool, and exclusive discounts on professional publication services from Editage.
Based on 22+ years of experience in academia, Editage All Access empowers researchers to put their best research forward and move closer to success. Explore our top AI Tools pack, AI Tools + Publication Services pack, or Build Your Own Plan. Find everything a researcher needs to succeed, all in one place – Get All Access now starting at just $14 a month!
