In certain research scenarios, non-probability sampling is employed to simplify the process of studying a population. This approach, while not guaranteeing unbiased results, offers a more practical and cost-effective alternative for researchers. Non-probability sampling allows for the selection of samples based on criteria such as judgment or convenience, making it a popular choice despite potential limitations in the accuracy of generalizations.
In this article, we explore non-probability sampling methods commonly used in various research settings. Get all you need to know about non-probability sampling, including its characteristics, types, and potential uses, and the difference between probability and non-probability sampling. In addition, this article highlights both the advantages, such as cost and time efficiency, and the disadvantages, including potential bias and limited generalizability, of non-probability sampling. Examples, such as its use in qualitative research or exploratory studies, are provided to illustrate the practical applications of non-probability sampling.
What is non-probability sampling?
Definition: Non-probability sampling is a sampling technique where the selection of participants is based on subjective judgment rather than random selection. Unlike probability sampling, where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected, non-probability sampling does not guarantee that every individual in the population has an equal opportunity to be part of the sample.¹ This method is considered less stringent because it relies heavily on the researcher’s discretion and the availability of participants, rather than on a rigorous, random process.
Non-probability sampling is particularly useful in research where the goal is to explore or gain insights into a specific population or phenomenon, rather than to make broad generalizations.² This is often the case in qualitative research, where researchers are interested in understanding the depth of a particular group, context, or behavior, rather than making statistical predictions about a larger population. It is also frequently used in exploratory studies, where the aim is to generate hypotheses, ideas, or theories that can later be tested using probability sampling.
When to use non-probability sampling?
Non-probability sampling is typically used in the following situations where random sampling is not feasible or necessary:
- Limited Resources: When time, budget, or access to a large population is limited, non-probability sampling provides a practical solution.
- Exploratory Research: Useful for exploratory or pilot studies, where the goal is to gather initial insights or generate hypotheses, rather than generalize findings.
- Qualitative Research: Often used in qualitative research, where the focus is on understanding a small, specific group in-depth, rather than producing generalizable results.
- Population Accessibility: When the target population is difficult to reach, such as niche or hard-to-find groups, non-probability sampling can help gather data.
- Time Constraints: Non-probability sampling can be quicker than probability sampling, making it ideal when the research needs to be conducted within a short time frame.
- Lack of a Sampling Frame: When a complete list of the population is unavailable, non-probability sampling methods (e.g., convenience or snowball sampling) can still be employed.
- No Need for Generalizability: If the research is focused on a specific case or group, and generalizing results to the broader population is not necessary, non-probability sampling can be suitable.
Types of non-probability sampling
Non-probability sampling types can be classified based on the criteria used to select the sample, which generally involves the researcher’s judgment or convenience rather than random selection. The different types are detailed as follows:
| Sampling Method | Description | Advantages | Disadvantages | Example |
| Convenience Sampling | Participants are selected based on their ease of access or availability. | Quick and inexpensive; easy to conduct. | High potential for bias; not representative of the whole population. | Surveying people at a shopping mall or university campus. |
| Judgmental (Purposive) Sampling | The researcher selects participants based on their expertise or judgment of who would provide the most relevant information. | Useful for gathering data from a specific group or experts. | Subjective; may exclude diverse perspectives. | Interviewing experienced doctors about a rare disease. |
| Snowball Sampling | Existing participants refer new participants, often used for hard-to-reach populations. | Effective for hard-to-reach or hidden populations. | Potential for bias as participants may refer similar individuals. | Studying people with a rare condition, where participants refer others in their community. |
| Quota Sampling | The researcher selects participants non-randomly to meet a specific quota of characteristics (e.g., age, gender, etc.). | Ensures representation of key characteristics within the sample. | May still suffer from selection bias due to non-random selection. | Surveying an equal number of men and women in a study on health habits. |
| Volunteer Sampling | Participants self-select to be part of the study, often through advertisements or calls for participants. | Easy to conduct and gather participants. | Voluntary nature may lead to a biased sample, often with motivated individuals. | A university study where students volunteer to take part in a psychology experiment. |
Each of these sampling methods has its advantages and disadvantages, making them useful in different situations, but they all carry risks of bias and lack of representativeness since they do not rely on random selection.
Non-probability sampling examples
| Sampling Method | Description | Example |
| Social Media Sampling | Researchers select participants based on their online presence, such as those who interact with certain hashtags or groups. This method is convenient but may be biased. | A researcher conducting a survey about new tech gadgets posts questions on a popular technology forum (e.g., Reddit or Twitter/X) and collects responses from users who express interest in tech topics. |
| River Sampling | Participants are chosen based on their presence in a specific location or event, selected in a flowing sequence. | A researcher conducts a survey at a local farmers’ market by approaching the first 50 shoppers who enter the market during a morning session to ask questions about food preferences. |
| Street Research | The researcher approaches people in a public place to participate in a survey or interview. It’s fast but may introduce selection bias. | A market researcher stops passersby on a busy city street during a weekday morning to gather opinions about public transportation services. |
Probability vs non-probability sampling: What is the difference?
| Characteristics | Probability Sampling | Non-Probability Sampling |
| Definition | Sampling methods that use random selection, where every member of the population has a known, non-zero chance of being selected. | Sampling methods where the selection process is not random, and some members of the population may not have a chance of being selected. |
| Types of Sampling | Simple Random Sampling, Stratified Sampling, Cluster Sampling, Systematic Sampling | Convenience Sampling, Judgmental Sampling, Snowball Sampling, Quota Sampling |
| Selection Process | Random selection based on known probabilities. | Selection based on researcher’s discretion or convenience. |
| Sampling Error | Less prone to sampling bias, but susceptible to errors. | Higher risk of sampling bias and errors. |
| Representativeness | More likely to represent the population accurately due to random selection. | Less likely to represent the population, as it may be based on convenience or judgment. |
| Cost and Time | Generally more costly and time-consuming due to the complexity of random selection. | Generally less costly and quicker to execute. |
| Example | Simple Random Sampling: Selecting 100 students randomly from a university list for a survey. | Convenience Sampling: Surveying the first 100 people who walk into a store. |
Advantages and disadvantages of non-probability sampling
When choosing a sampling method for your research, it’s important to know its advantages and disadvantages to make the right choice.
Advantages of non-probability sampling
| Aspect | Explanation |
| Cost-Effectiveness | Non-probability sampling is less expensive as it requires fewer resources and simpler procedures. |
| Timeliness | It is quicker to implement because it does not require a comprehensive sampling frame or randomization. |
| Accessibility | Enables researchers to study populations that are difficult to access, such as marginalized or rare groups. |
| Flexibility | Allows researchers to adapt the sampling process based on the study’s objectives or practical constraints. |
| Practicality | Ideal for generating preliminary insights, testing hypotheses, or conducting qualitative research.
|
Disadvantages of non-probability sampling
| Aspect | Explanation |
| Generalizability | Results cannot be reliably generalized to the entire population due to the lack of random selection. |
| Selection Bias | Researchers or participants may unintentionally introduce biases, affecting the sample’s representativeness. |
| Credibility | Non-probability sampling is often viewed as less rigorous, which may reduce the study’s perceived validity. |
| Subjective Judgment | The sample selection process can rely heavily on researcher discretion, increasing the risk of errors and limiting inference precision. |
Key takeaways
Non-probability sampling is a practical and flexible method for selecting participants when probability sampling is not feasible due to time, budget, or accessibility constraints. As a powerful research tool, non-probability sampling enables researchers to effectively target specific groups, study hard-to-reach populations, and conduct exploratory and qualitative research. Common types of non-probability sampling include convenience, purposive, quota, and snowball sampling, each expertly designed to meet research objectives. While non-probability sampling does not involve random selection, which can sometimes lead to biases, it can still be an effective method for gathering valuable insights and data. By clearly explaining the sampling process, acknowledging limitations, and interpreting results within context, researchers can enhance the credibility of their findings.
Frequently asked questions
1. How does non-probability sampling affect research outcomes?
Non-probability sampling can affect research outcomes by introducing potential biases and limiting the generalizability of findings. Since participants are not selected randomly, the sample may not accurately represent the broader population, leading to skewed or unbalanced data. This can influence the validity of statistical inferences and conclusions drawn from the study. Nonetheless, non-probability sampling is valuable in exploratory research, qualitative studies, or when targeting specific, hard-to-reach groups. By clearly acknowledging these limitations and transparently describing the sampling process, researchers can provide context for their findings and ensure they are interpreted appropriately within the study’s scope.
2. Why would a researcher choose non-probability sampling over probability sampling?
A researcher might choose non-probability sampling over probability sampling due to practical constraints such as time, budget, or accessibility to the target population. Non-probability sampling methods, such as convenience or purposive sampling, are quicker and easier to implement, especially when a sampling frame is unavailable or the research focuses on specific subgroups. It is also suitable for exploratory research or pilot studies where the goal is to gather preliminary insights rather than generalize findings to a broader population. However, researchers must account for potential biases and limitations in representativeness when interpreting the results.
3. What is snowball sampling, and when is it used?
Snowball sampling is a non-probability sampling technique where existing participants help recruit additional participants, creating a chain-like referral process. It is often used when studying hard-to-reach or specialized populations, such as marginalized groups, individuals with rare conditions, or participants in sensitive research areas. This method is beneficial when a formal sampling frame is unavailable, as it relies on social networks to identify potential respondents. While it provides access to otherwise inaccessible groups, researchers must be cautious of selection bias and ensure transparency in describing the sampling process and its limitations.
4. Can non-probability sampling be used in quantitative research?
Yes, non-probability sampling can be used in quantitative research, particularly in situations where random sampling is impractical due to time, budget, or accessibility constraints. While it limits generalizability and introduces potential bias, it is useful for exploratory studies or preliminary research. For example, in a survey assessing customer satisfaction at a new restaurant, researchers might use convenience sampling by collecting data only from customers present during specific hours. Although the findings may not represent all customers, the data can provide valuable insights into general trends or areas needing improvement.
5. What are the challenges using non-probability sampling?
Non-probability sampling poses several challenges, including a lack of representativeness, as the sample is not randomly selected, which limits the ability to generalize findings to the broader population. Selection bias can occur, as participants are often chosen based on convenience or judgment, excluding certain groups. Additionally, it is difficult to estimate sampling error or validate results, as each participant’s selection probability is unknown. This method is also less reliable for inferential statistics and may lead to overrepresentation or underrepresentation of specific population characteristics. Despite these limitations, it can still aid exploratory studies or when time and resources are constrained.
References
- Levy, P. S., & Lemeshow, S. (2013). Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications. Wiley.
- Pandey, P., & Pandey, M. M. (2021). Research methodology tools and techniques. Bridge Center.
R Discovery is a literature search and research reading platform that accelerates your research discovery journey by keeping you updated on the latest, most relevant scholarly content. With 250M+ research articles sourced from trusted aggregators like CrossRef, Unpaywall, PubMed, PubMed Central, Open Alex and top publishing houses like Springer Nature, JAMA, IOP, Taylor & Francis, NEJM, BMJ, Karger, SAGE, Emerald Publishing and more, R Discovery puts a world of research at your fingertips.
Try R Discovery Prime FREE for 1 week or upgrade at just US$72 a year to access premium features that let you listen to research on the go, read in your language, collaborate with peers, auto sync with reference managers, and much more. Choose a simpler, smarter way to find and read research – Download the app and start your free 7-day trial today!
