\n\n| Organization<\/td>\n | Sort data by source, time period, or theme; transcribe interviews<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
\n| Coding<\/td>\n | Assign labels to segments of data that represent concepts or themes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
\n| Pattern identification<\/td>\n | Look for recurring themes, contradictions, or surprising findings across sources<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
\n| Cross-source comparison<\/td>\n | Check whether interview data, documents, and observations tell a consistent story<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
\n| Theoretical interpretation<\/td>\n | Relate your patterns to the theoretical framework established in Step 3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
\n| Verification<\/td>\n | Re-check the analysis for accuracy and consistency; seek peer review or member checking<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n If you are using multiple cases, add a cross-case synthesis step: analyze each case individually first, then compare across cases to identify what varies and what is consistent.<\/p>\n <\/span>Step 7: Write and report your findings<\/span><\/h3>\nHow you report a case study depends on your purpose and audience. Two broad approaches exist:<\/p>\n <\/span>Structured (scientific paper) format:<\/span><\/h4>\n |